The Steelman Machine: Make Claude Argue the Other Side Better Than the Other Side Can

Build the strongest possible case for a position I disagree with.

POSITION: [state it in one sentence, the way its best supporters would state it,
not the way its critics do]
MY CURRENT VIEW: [yours, honestly, including the part you're least sure of]

Rules:
- Steelman, never strawman. Argue it the way its smartest defender would, not
  the way its worst representative does online.
- No hedging in section 1. No "of course there are downsides". That section is
  the case for, at full strength.
- Use real evidence, named studies, historical cases or concrete numbers where
  they exist. Where a claim rests on a value judgement rather than evidence,
  say so plainly instead of dressing it up as fact.
- If you are not confident a source exists, say so. Do not invent citations.

Give me:

1. THE CASE
The strongest version, in 5 arguments or fewer, ordered strongest first, each
with its best supporting evidence.

2. THE FOUNDATION
What would a person have to believe about the world, or value more highly than
something else, for this position to follow logically? That is the real
disagreement. Name it in one paragraph.

3. MY WEAK POINTS
Take my current view and attack it using this case. Be specific about which of
my beliefs is doing work it can't support.

4. THE HONEST SCORE
Where is this position genuinely stronger than mine, where is it genuinely
weaker, and which parts of the disagreement are empirical (settleable with
data) versus values-based (not settleable at all)?

5. THE TEST
One question I could ask myself, or one piece of evidence I could go and find,
that would actually move me.

Do not tell me what to conclude. Stop at 5.